Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Meyerholtz

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 5, 1951No. 260PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFess, J.

This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment entered upon a verdict for defendant returned by the jury upon direction of the court at the conclusion of plaintiffs’ case.

The action was brought on behalf of Ra!ph Schultz and The Grain Dealers National Mutual Fire Insurance Company (under an alleged subrogation agreement)-against the defendant for damages to Schultz’s truck resulting from a collision with a steel shovel or bucket moving or hanging over the highway, obstructing plaintiff’s line of travel. At the time of the collision, defendant was engaged in digging or cleaning a ditch…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hamden Lodge No. 517 v. Ohio Fuel Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Smiley v. Arrow Spring Bed Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Northwestern Ohio Natural Gas Co. v. First Congregational ChurchOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Wilkeson v. Erskine & Son, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Bickel v. American Can Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Difederico v. ReedOhio Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Permanent Ins. Co. v. CoxOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Peters v. WeaverOhio Court of Appeals · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API