Legal Opinion
Reed v. Bloom
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided May 1, 1936No. 6018PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHT, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Tom B. Reed, recovered a judgment against the defendant, Lloyd L. Bloom, in the district court of Oklahoma county, Old., on the 7th day of February, 1936, for injuries received in an automobile accident. After the rendition of said judgment, execution was issued against the defendant, Bloom; the execution being returned: “No property found.” Thereafter garnishment proceedings were instituted against the garnishee, Maryland Casualty Company, a nonresident corporation, in aid of the execution, under sections 500 and 501, O.S.1931.
The garnishee answered said…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Weston and Others v. the City Council of CharlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Terral v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- UNION PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Smith v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Harrison v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. v. CourtneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- International Organization Masters, Mates & Pilots of America, Local No. 2 v. International Organization Masters, Mates & Pilots of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Toney v. Maryland Casualty Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1939
- Franks v. City of Okemah, OklahomaDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1959
- Lawley v. WhiteisDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.