Legal Opinion

Comstock v. Corbin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1916No. Docket No. 56PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Alpena; Widdis, J., presiding. Bill by William A. Comstock against John A. Corbin and others for exoneration from liability on certain promissory notes made or indorsed by complainant as trustee. From a decree for complainant, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.

This case has many facts in common with the case of Comstock v. Potter, ante, 629 (158 N. W. 102), in which the opinion of the court is written by Mr. Chief Justice Stone. In that case the bill of complaint was a bill for contribution, but in this case it is in the nature of a bill for exoneration. 'A repetition of some of the essential facts is necessary here, so as to present the questions involved.

On May 11,1912, the plaintiff and all the defendants in this suit, with the exception of the Alpena County Savings Bank, were stockholders in the Alpena Motorcar'Company, a Michigan corporation…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Comstock v. PotterMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Belcher v. Birmingham Trust National BankDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1968
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Charleston Lead WorksDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1928
  3. Hack v. Concrete Wall CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Horak Prairie Farm, L.P. v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  5. Liquidation of Farmers State Bank of North BranchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API