Bank for Savings & Trusts v. United States Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
The question in this case is a controversy between the parties to a liability insurance contract, which covers liability for certain claims, but with the exception that it shall “not cover any accident caused by any driving animal, automobile or any other vehicle or any person while in charge of such animal or vehicle elsewhere than upon the premises described.”
There was an accident caused by operating a bicycle not upon the premises described, for which complainant is being sued. Does the policy except from the coverage an accident caused by such operation?
There are three…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. American Compounding Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- American-La France Fire Engine Co. v. RiordanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- North American Acc. Ins. Co. v. PittsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jernigan v. Hanover Fire Ins. Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Callen v. CallenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- Chamberlain v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Baltimore American Ins. Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- National Casualty Company v. ThompsonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.