Legal Opinion

Chamberlain v. Board of Commissioners

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 2, 1943No. 1 Div. 183PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This suit was filed under Article 13, Title 7, Code of 1940, sections 169 to 176, for the purpose of having the court determine the authority of the city of Mobile to issue certain proposed public improvement revenue bonds pursuant to sections 341 to 352, Title 37, Code of 1940, and the legality of the proceedings had in connection therewith, and the validity of the pledge of revenue contained in the resolution of the city commission adopted as required by law for their issuance.

The resolution is alleged to have been adopted August 25, 1942, and recites the fact that on June…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Oppenheim v. City of FlorenceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  2. City of Bessemer v. WhaleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. Grambs v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  4. City of Birmingham v. Hood-Mcpherson Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  5. Perry v. New Orleans, Mobile & Chattanooga RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Norton v. LuskSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  2. MOWRY v. McWherterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Rogers v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  4. United States v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
  5. Mitchell v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API