Novak v. Miller
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Commissioners’ Opinion, Division No. 1. Error from District Court, Tulsa County; W. B. Williams, Judge. Action by Elizabeth Miller against Samuel Novak. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
BAY, O.
Elizabeth Miller recovered a judgment for $500 for personal injuries suffered in a collision between a buggy in which she was riding and an automobile driven by Samuel Novak.
A number of errors are assigned, but are presented under two proposition, which may be briefly stated as follows: (1) The evidence was not sufficient to go to the jury on the question of the injuries and sufferings of which plaintiff complained for the reason that they were “of a nature that it required expert testimony of physicians to show that they were the result of being thrown to the pavement by the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Willet v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
3Cited by6 opinions
- Griesel v. FabianSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Oklahoma Union Ry. Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Allan v. TerrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. GrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Vallinoto v. DiSandroSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.