Legal Opinion

Winstead v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 13, 2017No. 1208331CV; A156458PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNCAN, J. pro tempore

In this post-conviction case, the court granted summary judgment against petitioner on the ground that her claims of inadequate assistance of counsel were barred by ORS 138.510(3) because they were not filed within two years of her conviction. On appeal, petitioner argues that, viewed in the light most favorable to her, the record demonstrates that the grounds asserted in her petition “could not reasonably have been raised in the original or amended petition,” ORS 138.510(3), thereby bringing them within the statutory exception to the two-year filing period. We agree…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Young v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Shipman v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Church v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State v. McNallyOregon Supreme Court · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lopez v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. Bean v. CainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. Hernandez-Zurita v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. Ingle v. MatteucciCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  5. Horath v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API