Legal Opinion

LaFayette v. Merchants' Bank

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 14, 1905PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Sebastian Circuit -Court, .Fort Smith District. Styles T. Rowe, Judge. statement by the court. LaFayette & Brother, merchants and dealers in live stock at Checotah, Ind. Ter., in June, 1898, entered into an agreement with one Boudinot Whitlock by which, under certain conditions, they were to advance money to Whitlock for the purchase of cattle.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Sebastian Circuit -Court, .Fort Smith District. Styles T. Rowe, Judge. statement by the court. LaFayette & Brother, merchants and dealers in live stock at Checotah, Ind. Ter., in June, 1898, entered into an agreement with one Boudinot Whitlock by which, under certain conditions, they were to advance money to Whitlock for the purchase of cattle. These conditions were that Whitlock, when he purchased cattle, should give the vendor of the cattle a draft on LaFayette & Brother for the price thereof, on the back of which draft there should be indorsed a bill of sale conveying the…

1Opinion of the Court

Riddick, J.,

(after stating the facts.) This is an action to recover money páid under mistake of fact. And the facts, briefly stated, are that one Boudinot Whitlock had an agreement with the plaintiffs, RaFayette & Brother, by which RaFayette & Brother agreed to pay drafts drawn by Whitlock on them for the purchase price of cattle, provided that a bill of sale signed by the vendor conveying the cattle to RaFayette & Brother should be indorsed on the back of the draft as security for the payment of the draft. . To enable Whitlock to have these drafts with bill of sale in proper form, blank…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Merchants' National Bank v. National Bank of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  2. Hortsman v. HenshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  3. Northampton National Bank v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  4. Carpenter v. Northborough National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Southwestern Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. BruceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  2. Baratti v. Koser Gin CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  3. Williams v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  4. Jones v. LewisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  5. Vick Consolidated School District No. 21 v. NewSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API