Earl v. State Personnel Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUARTE, J.
Baron R. Earl (Earl), a parole agent, was disciplined by his employer, California’s Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (Department) for conducting a purportedly unlawful search of a residence, and after an administrative hearing the discipline was upheld by the State Personnel Board (Board). Earl appeals from the trial court’s denial of his administrative mandamus petition, seeking to overturn the Board’s decision. He first contends that his motion to dismiss should have been granted due to lack of timely notice. He next argues that no substantial evidence shows the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Consumers Lobby Against Monopolies v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Mays v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Simpson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Zellerino v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Stockton Automobile Co. v. ConferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fisher v. State Pers. Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Squire v. Cnty. of L. A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Collins v. City of L.A. CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Fisher v. State Personnel Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2018
- Guam Waterworks Authority v. Civil Service Commission, and Joey A. Taitano, Real Party in Interest-AppellantSupreme Court of Guam · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.