Legal Opinion
Corenbaum v. Lampkin
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 30, 2013No. B236227; B237871PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, Acting P. J.
This case requires us to consider the impact and implications of the California Supreme Court’s opinion in Howell v. Hamilton Meats & Provisions, Inc. (2011) 52 Cal.4th 541 [129 Cal.Rptr.3d 325, 257 P.3d 1130] (Howell). As in Howell, the medical providers who treated plaintiffs in this case accepted, pursuant to prior agreements, less than the full amount of their medical billings as payment in full for their services. We must determine the admissibility in evidence of the full amount of an injured plaintiff’s medical billings not only with respect to damages for…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Sargon Enterprises, Inc. v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Coalition of Concerned Communities, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Bermudez v. CiolekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Markow v. RosnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Pulte Home Corp. v. Am. Safety Indem. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Fernandes v. Singh, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.