Legal Opinion
Illinois v. United States
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 14, 1956No. 56 C 681PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judge.
This is an action to set aside and enjoin the enforcement of an .order1 of the Interstate Commerce Commission2 authorizing the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company3 to put into effect intrastate rates or fares for Chicago area suburban service higher than those authorized by the Illinois Commerce Commission.4
The Milwaukee Road by petition to the interstate commission requested an investigation under § 13(4) of the Interstate Commerce act5 to determine wheth*197er intrastate suburban passenger rates approved by the state commission unjustly…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Florida v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- State of Florida v. United States Brooks-Scanlon Corporation v. Same. Wilson Lumber Co. Of Florida v. SameSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Kentucky Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957
- United States v. City of Jackson, MississippiDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1962
- Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Co. v. Illinois Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Co. v. Illinois Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958