Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bliss

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 1976No. Appeal, 63PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Spaeth, J.,

The record in this case suggests that appellant’s trial counsel and his appellate counsel may both have been incompetent. We have concluded that on the particular facts presented the best solution is to quash the appeal, with a suggestion to the lower court to appoint new counsel to represent appellant and to determine whether any further proceedings are warranted.

I

On September 12, 1973, the grand jury of Dauphin County returned six bills of indictment against appellant. Bills 1648 and 1649 charged appellant with having raped and committed sodomy on a 16-year-old-girl.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DancerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. ViaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. ReidSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. FieroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. FelderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. BlissSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. FelderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API