Commonwealth v. Brown
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
Appellant, found guilty on three counts of robbery, and on one count of rape and conspiracy, raises eleven allegations of error in his brief before this Court. However, appellant filed only boiler plate post-trial motions. A review of the colloquy after the verdict was returned indicates that the lower court did not inform appellant of the necessity of filing specific motions in order to preserve his claims for our review. Rule 1123(c), Pa.R.Crim.P., 19 P.S.Appendix. Therefore, we must remand for filing of those motions nunc pro tunc. Commonwealth v. Miller, 469 Pa. 370, 366…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BlairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. BaileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. CarterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. SchrothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. HiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CatheySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. ReedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. RinierSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.