Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Taylor
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 12, 1978No. 1732PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
The six Judges who decided this case being equally divided, the judgment of sentence is affirmed.
PRICE, J., files an opinion in support of affirmance in which JACOBS, President Judge and VAN der VOORT, J., join. HOFFMAN, J., files an opinion in support of reversal in which CERCONE and SPAETH, JJ., join. WATKINS, former President Judge, did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
OPINION IN SUPPORT OF AFFIRMANCE
PRICE, Judge:
Following a jury trial, appellant and his co-defendant were convicted of statutory rape, 1 rape, 2 and criminal conspiracy. 3 Written post-trial…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Commonwealth v. BlairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. TeganoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. HarmonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. HarmonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. KochSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.