Legal Opinion

Hester v. Allstate Insurance

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 1997No. COA96-739PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

We first consider whether the trial court erred in concluding that Allstate’s insurance policy provided liability insurance coverage for defendant Robert S. Lowery. We hold that the trial court correctly determined that Allstate’s policy provides coverage here.

When reviewing an insurance contract, we examine the contract as a whole and effectuate the intent of the parties. Blake v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 38 N.C. App. 555, 557, 248 S.E.2d 388, 390 (1978). The meaning of any language used in an insurance policy is a question of law. E.g., Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Westchester Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Woods v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State Capital Insurance v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. North Carolina Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Century Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Duke v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hester v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API