Legal Opinion

Schutz v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 15, 2012No. 1001509;148840Published

1Opinion of the CourtHadlock, J.

Claimant seeks judicial review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board in which the board affirmed employer’s denial of her claim for workers’ compensation benefits. Claimant suffered severe injuries in a car accident while driving home from a restaurant at which she had consumed a considerable amount of alcohol with another employee, whom she regarded as her supervisor. The board concluded that claimant’s injuries were noncompensable for several reasons, including that they did not arise out of her employment. We affirm.

We take the following facts from the board’s findings, which are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. HayesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Andrews v. Tektronix, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. Columbia River Dairy v. SepulvedaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API