Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v. Nichols
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.
While at work, claimant broke his tooth on an employer-supplied snack. He filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits. Employer’s insurer denied the claim on the ground that claimant’s injury was not sufficiently work related. An administrative law judge (ALJ) disapproved the denial and ordered insurer to accept the claim and provide benefits. The Workers’ Compensation Board (board) affirmed. Insurer seeks judicial review, arguing (as it did below) that the injury was not compensable because it resulted from a recreational or social activity. Because the facts are undisputed, we review…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rogers v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Andrews v. Tektronix, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Kaiel v. NCE Cultural Homestay InstituteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- McBroom v. Chamber of Commerce of the U.S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hearthstone Manor v. StuartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Legacy Health Systems & Legacy Health System v. NobleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Roberts v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- U.S. Bank v. PohrmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Washington Group International v. BarelaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.