Legal Opinion
CIT Group/Equipment Financing, Inc. v. Horizon Potash Corp.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided August 24, 1994No. 15646PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PICKARD, Judge.
The mechanics’ and materialmen’s lien statute for labor, equipment, and materials furnished in certain projects provides that:
Every person performing labor upon, providing ... equipment ... for, or furnishing materials to be used in the construction, alteration or repair of any mining claim ..., [or] who performs labor in any mining claim ... has a lien upon the same for the work or labor done, [and] for the ... agreed upon charge for the ... equipment ... provided ... or materials furnished____
NMSA 1978, § 48-2-2 (Cum.Supp.1992). The question we address today is whether…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Seaboard Surety Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1938
- Huntington National Bank v. SproulNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Watsabaugh & Co. v. Seaboard Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Lowery v. AtterburyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Mitchell v. McCutcheonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wills v. Board of Regents of the UniversityNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- Ellis v. Hobbs Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2020
- Ellis v. Hobbs Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2020
- Ellis v. Hobbs Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2020
- Wills v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of N.M.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015