Mal v. Unique Building Maintenance Co.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.
Claimant seeks review of a Worker’s Compensation Board order reversing the referee and holding that claimant failed to prove that her carpal tunnel syndrome is compensable. Employer cross-petitions from the portion of the Board’s order holding that claimant’s psychiatric disorder is compensable. On de novo review,1 we affirm.
Claimant, 51 years old at the time of the hearing, began working for employer as a janitress in 1982. In June 1983, she suffered a compensable low back injury. Several doctors treated her in 1983 for that injury. The claim was closed by a determination order on February…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Weller v. Union Carbide Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Dethlefs v. Hyster Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Jeld-Wen, Inc. v. PageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Kienow's Food Stores, Inc. v. LysterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Blakely v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nordstrom, Inc. v. GaulCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991