Legal Opinion

Andrews v. National Oil Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 1, 1933PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

“The office of a demurrer is to determine the legal sufficiency of a pleading, admitting for the purpose the truth of all the matters and things alleged therein.” Davies v. Blomberg, 185 N. C., at p. 496. Mountain Park Institute v. Lovill, 198 N. C., at p. 645-6.

In Smith v. Suitt, 199 N. C., at p. 9, speaking to the subject: “The complaint is not demurrable unless it is wholly insufficient. If a demurrer is interposed to a whole complaint and any one of the causes of action is good the demurrer will be overruled.”

The facts: The defendant was in possession of a filling station in the city of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stroud v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Rushing v. . Texas CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Mitchem v. . PasourSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. . McCrawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. Smith v. Gulf Oil Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Toler v. . FrenchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Cobb v. Gulf Refining Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  5. Moss v. . BowersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API