Legal Opinion
DeBiaso v. Spitz
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided July 2, 2013No. 03-12-cv-00967-HZPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
MARCO A. HERNANDEZ, District Judge.
Plaintiffs John DeBiaso and Rachael Ann Currie bring this action against Defendant Kristina Spitz, alleging that Spitz, in her role as a child protective services worker for the State of Oregon’s Department of Human Services (DHS), violated their constitutional rights and those of their child C.D., on whose behalf they appear as “next friend,” when Defendant removed C.D. from the family home following Plaintiffs’ arrests.
Defendant moves for summary judgment. I agree with Defendant that she did not violate Plaintiffs’ rights in removing C.D.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Davidson v. CannonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hoy v. Yamhill CountyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015