Legal Opinion

Haydnville Min. & Manuf'g Co. v. Art Institute

U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois

Decided July 22, 1889PublishedCited by 6 opinions

At Law. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the CourtBlodgett, J.

This is a suit to recover an alleged balance claimed to

be due the plaintiff for doing the fire-proofing work upon the building in the city of Chicago known as the “Art Institute;” the balance in suit being for extras, or extra work, claimed to have been furnished by the plaintiff over and above that called for by the contract; plaintiff’s claim *485aggregating $3,263, and defendant admitting that there is a balance of $648 due the plaintiff.

The main contention in the case is over the construction to he given the contract. The contract under which the plaintiff did the fire-proofing work upon the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Charles I. Hosmer, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Hansen v. CovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Henry Shenk Co. v. Erie CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Goss v. Northern Pacific Hospital Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Emporium Area Joint School Authority v. Anundson Construction & Building Supply Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API