Legal Opinion

United States v. Alisal Water Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 12, 2005No. 02-15907, 04-16210PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Opinion filed on October 13, 2005, slip opinion at 14045, is amended by the opinion filed concurrently with this order. With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing.

The petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. No further petitions for panel rehearing or petitions for rehearing en banc will be entertained.

OPINION

TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:

Appellants Robert and Natholyn Adcock and various private water systems they owned and operated in Monterey County, California, violated various public health and safety regulations under the federal Safe Drinking…

2Cases cited43 opinions

Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

United States v. Alisal Water Corporation Toro Water Service, Inc. North Monterey County Water Service, Inc. Moss Landing Water Service, Inc. Natholyn P. Adcock Robert T. Adcock, United States of America v. Alisal Water Corporation Toro Water Service, Inc. Robert T. Adcock North Monterey County Water Service, Inc. Moss Landing Water Service, Inc. Natholyn P. Adcock, and Patricia Adcock Bruce Pierson David M. Simcho, John W. Richardson, ReceiverCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005