Legal Opinion

Almers v. South Carolina National Bank

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 26, 1975No. 20047PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

This case involves the question of whether a non-competition clause in a noncontributory pension plan, where such clause is unlimited in terms of time and geographical extent, constitutes an unreasonable restraint on trade, and is thus void and unenforceable as against public policy.

Aimers was an employee of the South Carolina National Bank (hereinafter SCN) of Charleston, during a seventeen-year period from 1948 until 1965. In 1965, he left the respondent’s employ and took a position with Southern Bank and Trust Company (hereinafter Southern), in Green-ville, South Carolina. At…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Muggill v. Reuben H. Donnelley Corp.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. SC FINANCE CORP. OF ANDERSON v. West Side Finance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  3. Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. GreeleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  4. Flammer v. PattonSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  5. Standard Register Co. v. KerriganSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Deming v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  2. Barnes Group, Inc. v. C & C Products, Inc., and Roy E. McGuireCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  3. Bayly, Martin & Fay, Inc. v. PickardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. Cheney v. Automatic Sprinkler Corp. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  5. Carolina Chemical Equipment Co. v. MuckenfussCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API