Legal Opinion

Ludlow v. Hardy

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1878PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Case made from Kent. Assumpsit. Plaintiff had judgment below.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

Ludlow, as plaintiff, recovered in the court below, and Hardy removed the cause to this court upon a case.

In the fall of 1874 Ludlow sold a quantity of liquors to Hardy, and the sale is claimed to have been contrary to the act then in force to prevent the manufacture and sale of spirituous and intoxicating liquors as a beverage. After the repeal of that statute, Hardy, in consideration of the sale and of an extension of the time of payment, made a new promise, and in fact paid $22. The court below allowed recovery upon this new promise, and the only question is upon the validity of that…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Willcox v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Fitzsimons v. Eagle Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  3. Village of Mount Pleasant v. VansiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Government of French Republic v. CabotNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Modern Brotherhood of America v. LockColorado Court of Appeals · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API