Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1936No. 5749PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLAND, Justice.

Defendant was charged by the information of the district attorney of the Third judicial district with the crime of statutory rape; that is, sexual intercourse with a girl under the age of thirteen years. He was convicted by the jury of the crime of assault with intent to commit rape. He appeals and assigns numerous errors. It will serve no useful purpose to recite the facts testified to by the witnesses. The evidence for the State tended to prove the commission of the completed crime of rape as charged. The testimony offered by the defendant was in direct conflict with that…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. State v. CoboUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  2. State v. HilbergUtah Supreme Court · 1900
  3. State v. RobySupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  4. State v. SmailesIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  5. People v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. United States v. KobliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  2. MATTER OF UNITED PRESS ASSNS. v. ValenteNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. United States of America Ex Rel. Anthony Bruno v. Ross E. Herold, M.D., Director of Dannemora State Hospital, Dannemora, NewyorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  4. State v. ElsenIdaho Supreme Court · 1947
  5. State v. SchmitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API