Legal Opinion

Ogden Standard Examiner v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1983No. 18311PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

The plaintiffs have filed a petition for writ of review from an order of the Industrial Commission holding them liable for compensation benefits to the dependents of Clifford P. Cheney. We affirm the order of the Industrial Commission.

The standard of review utilized by this Court in Industrial Commission cases is stringent:

[Our inquiry is] whether the Commission’s findings are “arbitrary and capricious,” or “wholly without cause” or contrary to the “one [inevitable] conclusion from the evidence” or without “any substantial evidence” to support them. Only then should the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Adel v. ParkhurstWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Sabo's Electronic Service v. SaboUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Martinson v. W-M Insurance Agency, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. STATE TAX COM'N v. Industrial Com'n of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Kerans v. Industrial Com'n of State of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Blaine v. Industrial Com'n of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Carnesecca v. Wasatch Bank of Pleasant GroveUtah Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API