Legal Opinion

Sabo's Electronic Service v. Sabo

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1982No. 17396PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice:

This is an appeal from a decision of the Industrial Commission which granted workmen’s compensation benefits to defendant Carl E. Sabo.

Defendant owns and operates a sole proprietorship business in Moab, Utah, known as Sabo’s Electronic Service. In addition to defendant and his wife, the business employs a secretary and a technician. The business consists of a store located in a shopping center and a warehouse located behind the Sabos’ personal residence.

Prior to going to the store on June 5, 1979, defendant was loading some merchandise into his service bus from the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bountiful Brick Co. v. GilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Kaiser Steel Corp. v. MonfrediUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Carling v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Bountiful Brick Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Schmidt v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Allen v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Kincheloe v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of OgdenUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Johnston v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  4. Lancaster v. Gilbert DevelopmentUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Billings Computer Corp. v. TarangoUtah Supreme Court · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API