Legal Opinion
Board of County Commissioners of the County of San Miguel v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided May 21, 2007No. 06SA213PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hobbs
In this original proceeding under C.A.R. 21, we determine whether the Colorado Public Utilities Commission ("PUC" or "Commission"), pursuant to sections 40-6-113(6) and 40-6-115, C.R.S. (2006), must include in the record of its proceedings advisory memoran-da received from its staff and considered by the Commissioners in the deliberative phase of their proceedings.1
PUC employees include among their numbers two groups of agency experts-a testimonial staff and an advisory staff. Performing different functions in PUC proceedings, these two groups operate independently and in isolation of each…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hendricks v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- People v. CrossSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- AviComm, Inc. v. Colorado Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Lobato v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- CLPF-Parkridge One, L.P. v. Harwell Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Stamp v. Vail Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- Gessler v. Colorado Common CauseSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
- Colorado Citizens for Ethics in Government v. Committee for American DreamColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- Smith v. JeppsenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
- Colorado Consumer Health Initiative v. Colorado Board of HealthColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.