Rauer v. Fay
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. Walter H. Levy, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
This is an action to foreclose a lien for street work performed under a private contract, and in which a lien was filed pursuant to section 1191 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Plaintiff had judgment, from which, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appeals.
The complaint is in the usual form; pleads a contract between defendant and one J. Gr. Duffy, the assignment *364thereof to plaintiff by Duffy, the performance of the work by plaintiff, and the filing of the lien, etc. The contract and the contents of the lien are pleaded according to their legal tenor and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mills v. La Verne Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by10 opinions
- American National Bank of San Francisco v. A. G. Sommerville, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Whiting v. SquegliaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- California Portland Cement Co. v. Wentworth Hotel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Union Supply Co. v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Parker v. FunkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.