Legal Opinion

Townsend v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 27, 2002No. C6-02-61PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BLATZ, Chief Justice.

Otha Townsend appeals from the denial of his second petition for postconviction relief. Appellant Townsend was convicted of first-degree murder in 1994, and on direct appeal he raised the admissibility of evidence relating to an attempted murder he later pleaded guilty to, committed on the same night as the murder. We held that certain of the evidence was inadmissible but its admission was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, applying a standard that the error is harmless if the weight of all the other evidence is such that it “justifies the verdict regardless of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  5. State v. JuarezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. CaulfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. State v. CourtneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  3. State v. Al-NaseerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  4. State v. ChauvinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  5. State v. FardanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API