Legal Opinion

Coakley v. Posey

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 13, 2019No. 2:19-cv-12300Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION TYWAUN COAKLEY, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:19-cv-12300 v. HON. PAUL D. BORMAN DET. STEVE POSEY, DETROIT POLICE DEPARTMENT and CITY OF DETROIT, Defendants. / OPINION AND ORDER OF SUMMARY DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 1) Plaintiff Tywaun Coakley’s pro se civil rights complaint under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

is before the Court for initial screening following a grant of in forma pauperis status. (ECF No. 4.) Under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A and 1915(e), and 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(c)(1), the Court is required to dismiss the case before…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API