Legal Opinion
Sargis v. Donahue
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 14, 2013No. AC 32992PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROBINSON, J.
In this medical malpractice action, the substitute plaintiff, Robert S. Sargis, Sr., executor for the estate of Cynthia Sargis (decedent),1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict filed by the defendants, Terrence Donahue, a physician, and New Britain Surgical Group, Inc. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court erred when it (1) applied an improper standard of proof for causation and (2) granted the defendants’ motion.2 We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
*507The record reveals the following…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gagne v. VaccaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Harris v. Bradley Memorial Hospital & Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- LaBieniec v. BakerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Borkowski v. SachetiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Suarez v. SordoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Arroyo v. University of Connecticut Health CenterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Procaccini v. Lawrence & Memorial Hospital, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Cockayne v. Bristol Hospital, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- Ward v. RamseyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013