Legal Opinion

Sammy Louis Haynes v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 20, 1970No. 24256_1Published

1Per curiam

On June 4, 1968, Sammy Louis Haynes and two codefendants were found guilty of bank robbery with a dangerous weapon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) (d) (1964). Haynes has appealed to this Court, alleging five separate grounds: insufficient evidence, prejudicial misjoinder, unlawful search and seizure, admission of improper evidence of “sudden wealth”, and misconduct of the prosecutor during final argument.

We have examined the record with care and find no merit in appellant’s first four allegations of error. The issue of prosecutorial misconduct, however, requires brief discussion.

In his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Jerome J. HaskellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  2. Donald Wayne Sumrall, Joe Jerrell Crocker and Raymond Claude Nabors v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  3. United States v. HaskellDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API