Legal Opinion

United States v. Haskell

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided January 29, 1963No. Crim. No. 10306PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIMBERS, District Judge.

Defendant Jerome J. Haskell, after a ten day trial, was convicted by a jury of conspiracy to evade income taxes.1 He was sentenced to one year and a day in jail, fined $5,000 and ordered to pay the costs of prosecution.

He has moved, pursuant to Rule 29, Fed.R.Crim.Proc., to set aside the verdict and enter judgment of acquittal; or, pursuant to Rule 33, for a new trial; or, pursuant to Rule 35, to reduce sentence.

The Government has moved to dismiss defendant’s motions under Rules 29 and 33 on the ground they were not filed within the time prescribed by law and the Court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Raymond Lee Mills v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
  4. United States v. John David ProvooCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  5. United States Ex Rel. Brown v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. DarlandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  2. Sammy Louis Haynes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API