Legal Opinion

Southern Natural Gas Co. v. Davidson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 10, 1932No. 6 Div. 869PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

This is an action for damages resulting from a collision of a ear of defendant driven by one Ed Green, as its agent, etc., with that driven by plaintiff on a highway in this state.

Plaintiff’s theory was that Ed Green was under the influence of intoxicating liquor at the time — admittedly material evidence. A witness may testify that the conduct and appearance of another was that he was intoxicated (May v. State, 167 Ala. 36 (8), 52 So. 602; Stoudemire v. Davis, 208 Ala. 495, 94 So. 498; Burke v. Tidwell, 211 Ala. 673, 101 So. 599), but we do not think it is meant that such is the only method…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Vanmeter v. GoldfarbIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Barnett's Administrator v. BrandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. CharmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  4. State Ex Rel. Thomas v. DauesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  5. Kuykendall v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Blue v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  2. Richards v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. MacIejczak v. BartellWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Fincham Ex Rel. Fincham v. MuellerNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Stanley v. HayesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API