Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Smith v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 2014No. 2012-0734Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State ex rel. Smith v. Indus. Comm., 138 Ohio St.3d 312,

2014-Ohio-513.] THE STATE EX REL. SMITH, APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE; OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, APPELLANT. [Cite as State ex rel. Smith v. Indus. Comm., 138 Ohio St.3d 312,

2014-Ohio-513.] Workers’ compensation—R.C. 4123.57(B)—Scheduled-loss benefits for loss of vision and hearing—Evidence does not support a finding that claimant’s eyes and ears no longer function—Inability to process sights and sounds due to anoxic brain damage—Appellate court’s judgment granting writ of mandamus reversed. (No.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. AutoZone, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State ex rel. Kincaid v. Allen Refractories Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State Ex Rel. Smith v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State ex rel. Sheller-Globe Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Smith ex rel. Smith v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API