Legal Opinion

Karl v. State of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 17, 1939No. Claim 24751; Claim 24752PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHubbs, J.

The Elmira-Rochester State highway is a heavily traveled road. It is in charge of the State Superintendent of Public Works (Highway Law [Cons. Laws, ch. 25], § 12). On November 20, 1935, an automobile accident occurred near Conesus, which was caused by a so-called “ fat spot ” on the surface of the tarred road, without negligence on the part of the claimants. A “ fat spot ” was described by a witness as a spot where there is an excessive amount of bituminous material on the surface of the pavement. The spot was about thirty feet long and fifteen feet wide. It was very smooth and became very…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matthews v. Truax, Carsley & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Neddo v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1948
  2. Laitenberger v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1947
  3. Sutherland v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1947
  4. Torrey v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1940
  5. Dawley v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1946

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API