Legal Opinion

In re Orren

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 22, 2017No. 12-17-00313-CVPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

James T. Worthen, Chief Justice

Jennifer Orren seeks mandamus relief from the trial court’s order granting Dale Blocker and David George’s motion for new trial.1 In a single issue, she contends that the trial court abused its discretion by granting the new trial and that she has no adequate remedy at law. We conditionally grant the writ.

Background

Blocker and George were involved in a motor vehicle collision with Orren in March 2014. They subsequently sued Or-ren, alleging they were injured as a result of the collision. At trial, Blocker and George each alleged that they injured them…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Dow Chemical Co. v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Golden Eagle Archery, Inc. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. McGalliard v. KuhlmannTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. In Re Cerberus Capital Management, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
  5. In Re Columbia Medical Center of Las Colinas, Subsidiary, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re CambellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2019
  2. Albert Hambrick v. Foremost County Mutual Insurance, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2024
  3. In Re Bernabe Lemus v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2025
  4. In Re Spotted Lakes, LLC D/B/A 1845 Oil Field Services v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2024
  5. William Blevins v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API