Legal Opinion
Roe v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company NA
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided February 4, 2025No. 3:24-cv-05338Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 JAN ROE, Case No. 3:24-cv-05338 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES 10 DEUSTCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST 11 CO. NA et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 15 On November 1, 2024, the Court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss against Plaintiff 16 Jan Roe. See Dkt. 46. Plaintiff alleged that Washington law had started the clock on the statute of 17 limitations for a Deed of Trust held by Defendants on Plaintiff’s property. Id. at…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.