Legal Opinion

State v. Lee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1985No. 83-932-CRPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Bablitch, J.

The State of Wisconsin (State) seeks review of a decision suppressing Scott Lee’s inculpatory statement. The court of appeals held that the police violated Lee’s constitutional right to counsel by initiating communication with him, through his stepmother, after he invoked his right to counsel. Because of the extent of police involvement in the actions of Lee’s stepmother, we conclude that she was acting on behalf of the police in her efforts to elicit Lee’s cooperation with the police. Inasmuch as Lee had already invoked his right to counsel and did not himself initiate communication with the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. TurnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. KramarWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. LangeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
  4. State v. KunkelCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  5. State v. PheilCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API