Rubenstein v. Doe No. 1
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChin, J.
In 2012, plaintiff, Latrice Rubenstein, filed a claim with defendant Doe No. 1 (defendant), a public entity, alleging that from 1993 to 1994, when she was a high school student, her cross-country and track coach, who was defendant's employee, sexually molested her. When the claim was denied, she commenced the instant action against defendant and defendants Does Nos. 2-20. She alleged that latent memories of the sexual abuse resurfaced in early 2012, when she was about 34 years old. As explained below, before suing a public entity, one must generally present a timely claim to that entity. The…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Shirk v. Vista Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Romano v. Rockwell International, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
- City of Stockton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Last Frontier Healthcare Dist. v. Superior Court of Modoc Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- (PC) Bowers v. OwolabiDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- (PC) Dunn v. RodriguezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- (PC) Gibson v. MoseleyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- (PC) Jaime v. Kern MedicalDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.