Legal Opinion

Rubenstein v. Doe No. 1

California Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 2017No. S234269PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChin, J.

In 2012, plaintiff, Latrice Rubenstein, filed a claim with defendant Doe No. 1 (defendant), a public entity, alleging that from 1993 to 1994, when she was a high school student, her cross-country and track coach, who was defendant's employee, sexually molested her. When the claim was denied, she commenced the instant action against defendant and defendants Does Nos. 2-20. She alleged that latent memories of the sexual abuse resurfaced in early 2012, when she was about 34 years old. As explained below, before suing a public entity, one must generally present a timely claim to that entity. The…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Shirk v. Vista Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Romano v. Rockwell International, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
  5. City of Stockton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Last Frontier Healthcare Dist. v. Superior Court of Modoc Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. (PC) Bowers v. OwolabiDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  3. (PC) Dunn v. RodriguezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  4. (PC) Gibson v. MoseleyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  5. (PC) Jaime v. Kern MedicalDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API