Legal Opinion

Woodruff v. Moore

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 21, 1938No. 27910PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

The plaintiff, an attorney, entered into a written contract with the defendant wherein he was to receive a contingent attorney’s fee of 20 per cent, of whatever reduction he would obtain in the defendant’s federal income tax. He obtained a reduction of $30,000, entitling him to a fee of $6,000. Occasional payments, were made, totaling $2,500, leaving $3,500 remaining due when the plaintiff filed spit for that amount. After suit was filed the defendant and others in his behalf made payments from time to time, so that the plaintiff permitted the action to lie dormant in district court for some…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nu-Pro, Inc. v. GL Bartlett & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  2. Ross v. PaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  3. Craig v. CabelkaCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. Tosto v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
  5. Crawford Ex Rel. Crawford v. GipsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API