Legal Opinion
Ross v. Pace
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 24, 2004No. 98,149PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWinchester, J.
¶ 1 The issue is whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion of the appellant, Betty Ross, to vacate a default judgment in favor of the appellee, Betty Pace. We hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 On October 27, 2000, Ross filed a petition in the district court alleging that she entered an intersection on a green light, and began to turn left when Pace ran through a red light striking Ross's vehicle in the left side, rear panel. Ross was seriously injured by the accident.
¶ 3 Along with her answer denying the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Schepp v. HessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Woodruff v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
3Cited by9 opinions
- FIRST PRYORITY BANK v. MOONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
- FIRST PRYORITY BANK v. MOONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
- Heath v. EngleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Tosto v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
- WILLIAMS v. MEEKER NORTH DAWSON NURSING LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.