Crawford Ex Rel. Crawford v. Gipson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentDoolin, Justice
I find no fault with the majority opinion which affords standing to State Farm in seeking vacation of the default judgment. I concur in Part I.
I dissent to Part II of the majority opinion, when it holds the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to vacate the default judgment.
In affirming the decision of the trial court, we follow the general rule that where it is contended that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to vacate a default judgment, and the question of such abuse depends on a disputed question of fact pertaining to the ground relied on for vacating the…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wagner v. LucasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Burroughs v. Bob Martin CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Kollmeyer Ex Rel. Kollmeyer v. WillisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
- Lindsey v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Leslie v. SpencerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.