Legal Opinion

American State Bank v. Marks (In Re MacNeil)

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 11, 1989No. BAP No. OR-88-1877-MeJMo, Bankruptcy No. 386-02740-S7Published

1Opinion of the Court

102 B.R. 766 (1989)

In re Donald MacNEIL and Sharlee MacNeil, Debtors.

AMERICAN STATE BANK and CIT Financial Services, Inc., Appellants,

v.

Thomas G. MARKS, Appellee.

BAP No. OR-88-1877-MeJMo, Bankruptcy No. 386-02740-S7.

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted March 16, 1989.

Decided August 11, 1989.

John M. Bernam, Beaverton, Or., for appellants.

James C. Waggoner, Portland, Or., for appellee.

Before MEYERS, JONES and MOOREMAN, Bankruptcy Judges.

2Per curiam

I

We are asked to review a decision which gave a superpriority claim arising during the course of a liquidation…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Philbrook v. GlodgettSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Nicholas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. In Re Codesco, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  5. In Re Windmill Farms, Inc., Debtor. Vanderpark Properties, Inc. v. David L. Buchbinder, Trustee of Windmill Farms Management Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API