Legal Opinion

People v. Mims

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 9, 1955No. Crim. 3145PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

The People appeal from an order of the Superior Court granting respondent’s motion to set aside an information charging him with a violation of Penal Code, section 666 (petty theft after a previous conviction of petty theft). The motion was made and granted on the ground that respondent had been once in jeopardy.

Respondent was charged with petty theft (Pen. Code, § 488) in the municipal court. He pleaded guilty on January 20, 1955; his plea was regularly entered and the municipal judge continued the case to January 27, 1955, for judgment. On January 21, 1955, the district attorney filed a…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. People v. GreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. In Re LavineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. McBean v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  5. People v. KrupaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. County of Sacramento v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. People v. TidemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. People v. Superior Court (Jurado)California Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Gonzalez v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. People v. Abdul Y.California Court of Appeal · 1982

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API