Legal Opinion

Bradley v. Bouchard

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1891PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Cheboygan. (Ramsdell, J.) Replevin. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion..

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

This is an action of replevin for about ■50,000 feet of pine saw-logs, marked “J. P. P.,” levied upon by the defendant, as village marshal of Cheboygan, to satisfy a tax assessed on personal property in the name of one F. E. Bradley in April, 1888. The plaintiffs claimed to be the owners of the logs. The court below directed a verdict in favor of the defendant.

The facts are not much’ in dispute, and are substan*19tially as follows: The assessment against F. E. Bradley was on the roll as, “Personal property, $14,500.” The tax apportioned upon and levied against the same was $166.75. This…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Petrie Lumber Co. v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Crawford v. KochMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. White Pine Manufacturing Co. v. MoreyIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Cobban v. HindsMontana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Wade, Et Vir. v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  5. Hertzler v. FreemanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API