Legal Opinion
REDEVELOP. AUTH. OF OIL CITY v. Woodring
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 26, 1982PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LARSEN, Justice.
On May 17, 1978, appellee, Jane T. Woodring, filed a petition for the appointment of a board of viewers in the Venango County Court of Common Pleas,1 alleging that the actions of appellant, the Redevelopment Authority of Oil City (hereinafter Authority),2 constituted a de facto taking of her property, and that she was entitled to just compensation.3
After an evidentiary hearing on the petition, the court of common pleas concluded that a de facto taking had occurred and directed the appointment of a board of viewers to ascertain just compensation for Mrs. Woodring. On…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Griggs v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- White's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Conroy-Prugh Glass Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Medinger AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Griggs v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Coffman v. Wilson Police DepartmentDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Zettlemoyer v. Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- City of Albuquerque v. New Mexico Public Regulation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re De Facto Condemnation & Taking of Lands of WBF AssociatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Elser v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.