Legal Opinion

Chism v. Hollis

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1928No. 27368PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGowen, J.

Chism and wife, appellants here, complainants in the court below, filed their bill in the chancery court of Monroe county against K. L. and P. M. Hollis, appellees here, defendants in the court below, seeking a cancellation of a certain gas and oil lease executed by them in favor of the appellees, and alleging that the appellees procured the lease by fraud, and that same was void because not supported by valuable consideration.

The appellees filed an answer to the bill, denying the fraud, and also denying that the lease was not supported by a good and valuable consideration.

Tlie court below…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Guffey v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Poe v. UlreyIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Eclipse Oil Co. v. South Penn Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Gillespie v. Fulton Oil & Gas Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Allegheny Oil Co. v. SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lloyd's Estate v. Mullen Tractor & Equipment Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Armstrong v. Southern Production Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
  3. Superior Oil Co. v. BeeryMississippi Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Superior Oil Co. v. BeeryMississippi Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API